Editing Use Case report

Hi,

Thanks Karen and Antoine for taking care of the report. Antoine you did not
caused any trouble, I appreciate the time you have taken in reviewing/fixing
the report. As Karen mentioned, I have still two pending tasks since last
week, which I am finally addressing today.

I will send my changes to Karen so she can review them today.


Cheers,

Daniel


2011/9/11 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>

> Ooops, sorry if I caused trouble. But I guess Daniel will not be unhappy,
> if I've stolen some of his work.
> Plus, I think he would have not been able to make some of the changes. For
> instance, Daniel joined the group after the discussion on "case" vs. "use
> case"...
>
> Antoine
>
>
>
>
>>> Finally, I've removed the authors of clusters from the cluster section. I
>>> seem to remember that we had decided to put them in the ack section at the
>>> end of the report. If I'm wrong this can be changed of course. By the way
>>> I've updated a couple of the cluster wiki pages, so that readers are sure to
>>> find the right names here
>>>
>>
>> Antoine, note that Daniel is still working on this section, so we should
>> not make any conclusions until we hear that he is done.
>>
>> I've been editing that section (it was assigned to me), and was going to
>> remove the names on the clusters today. Since you have done that, please be
>> sure that all of the editors are included in the acknowledgements, if you
>> have not done so already.
>>
>> kc
>>
>>
>>>
>>> There are still some problems, however:
>>> A first one is the use of non-verbal sentences in Citation and Digital
>>> object clusters. The second one, more important, is that the "Generalized
>>> use cases" are empty in the Collections cluster. Is that on purpose?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>