- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:43:50 -0400
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:13:41AM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: > >Note that the Toolkit also uses an ampersand version of the title, "RDA: > >Resource Description & Access", which poses a potential dilemma > >for catalogers > >as to which is the preferred title (but that discussion is far > >more appropriate > >for, say, RDA-L ;-) > > Yes, I was considering that "&" a "flourish" since in the text they > use "and." I've been avoiding "&" throughout the sections I've been > editing since it's rarely necessary and can be a real nuisance in > html. +1 to avoid ampersands -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 17:44:21 UTC