- From: <gordon@gordondunsire.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:53:45 +0100 (BST)
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Message-ID: <1362972283.147131.1315670025712.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxltgw04.schlund.de>
All On 10 September 2011 at 16:11 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote: > Quoting "gordon@gordondunsire.com" <gordon@gordondunsire.com>: > > > All > > > > The correct title of the organization known by the acronym JSC is "Joint > > Steering Committee for Development of RDA" (no "the" and no > > expansion of RDA). > > > > The correct title must be used in the final report, I think we'd all agree. > > I thought we already had: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Sep/0030.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2011Sep/0032.html Both references retain, erroneously, an interpolated "the". Seehttp://www.rda-jsc.org/ > > > > > The correct title of the resource known by the acronym RDA is "RDA: resource > > description and access", so the acronym is spelled out as part of the > > correct > > title. In most standard document styles, the first reference to RDA should > > therefore be: "RDA: resource description and access (RDA)", with the acronym > > "RDA" used thereafter. > > The lower case of that makes me think that the title cited comes from > a library catalog entry. The RDA Toolkit lists the title as: > > RDA: Resource Description and Access > > In the report we have used title case for titles of resources, not the > sentence case of cataloging. OK, I was applying RDA to the title of RDA; that is, as if it were a catalog entry. If the report style is to use title case, then "RDA: Resource Description and Access (RDA)" is correct, and the report should be amended. Note that the Toolkit also uses an ampersand version of the title, "RDA: Resource Description & Access", which poses a potential dilemma for catalogers as to which is the preferred title (but that discussion is far more appropriate for, say, RDA-L ;-) Cheers Gordon > > kc > > > > > But apart from the reference to JSC, the acronym RDA does not appear in the > > final report until Appendix A, and only appears once. So there is no need > > for > > the acronym to be given in brackets for subsequent citations, as > > there are none. > > > > So I suggest that the text is amended: > > > > 1. In the body of the final report ""Joint Steering Committee for > > Development of > > RDA (JSC)". > > 2. In Appendix A "RDA: resource description and access". > > > > I do not think it is necessary to expand the RDA bit of the name of the JSC. > > > > Cheers > > > > Gordon > > > > > > > > On 09 September 2011 at 19:52 Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org> > > wrote: > > > > > >> So far, RDA does *not* appear earlier in the report. So I've revised this > >> to > >> use the (JSC), but left the somewhat incorrect title: > >> Joint Steering Committee for the Development of Resource Description and > >> Access (JSC) > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6353&oldid=6339 > >> There's no obvious place to insert a reference to RDA earlier, but perhaps > >> you're more clever than I am on that! > >> :) -Jodi > >> > >> > >> > >> On 9 Sep 2011, at 19:48, Karen Coyle wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > I was hoping that RDA would be de-acronymed earlier in the report. It's > >> > quite awkward to do it here. The name the group gives itself is > >> > > >> > "Joint Steering Committee for the Development of RDA". I think we can > >> > give > >> > that followed by "(JSC)", and assume we'll spell out RDA elsewhere. > >> > > >> > kc > >> > > >> > Quoting Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org > >> > [mailto:jodi.schneider@deri.org] >: > >> > > >> > > >> > > I was a little confused to see RDA rather than JSC here for the Joint > >> > > Steering Committee. Is that intentional? I remember that we'd discussed > >> > > spelling out RDA itself... > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > -Jodi > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Standardization in the library world is often undertaken by > >> bodies focused > >> > > exclusively on the library domain, such as the International > >> Federation of > >> > > Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) or the Joint Steering > >> > > Committee for the Development of Resource Description and Access (RDA). > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Karen Coyle > >> > kcoyle@kcoyle.net [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net] http://kcoyle.net > >> > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > >> > m: 1-510-435-8234 > >> > skype: kcoylenet > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- > Karen Coyle > kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net > ph: 1-510-540-7596 > m: 1-510-435-8234 > skype: kcoylenet > >
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 15:54:33 UTC