- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:52:38 -0400
- To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:16:05PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: > >As I see it, the point is not that libraries would themselves add links from > >biographers or genealogists, but that by opening their data they would be > >making it possible for biographers and genealogists themselves to > >add the links > >-- which is not quite what your sentence says. > > Isn't the linked data message that by opening data as linked data > the links "exist", and in both directions? It's not that > genealogists and librarians would add links, but that both would > create data in a linked data format. Any *relationships* created > between URIs should benefit the entire LD cloud. That's certainly true, and perhaps that is what we really want to say. I was comparing to the original text, which says: "Data from biographers or genealogists, for example, would immensely enrich resource descriptions in areas to which librarians traditionally do not themselves attend" -- emphasizing the potential links made by non-librarians to library data (because they are areas to which librarians traditional do not themselves attend). Antoine's proposed re-write, in contrast, says that libraries would reap benefits, etc. Then in the next sentence: "Adding links to data from biographers or genealogists, for example, would..." -- which (in my reading) emphasizes links made by librarians pointing to non-library data. None of the above are wrong; it's a question of what we want to emphasize. I thought the intention was to emphasize the enrichment of library data through the creation of links by outsiders (non-librarians), but it would be fine with me to word the message to emphasize more the "bi-directional" nature of links -- and to convey, as I think you propose, that "adding links" is not a process of going in and editing someone else's data (!), but simply of declaring relationships to other data and publishing those relationships as Linked Data. Tom -- Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 22:53:14 UTC