- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:57:53 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
OK, I've made it "things". Thanks, Antoine > Hey - I like it! :-) Much better than "entity"... > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 10:33:14PM -0400, Marcia Zeng wrote: >> Tim Berners-Lee used 'identify things'...[1] :-) >> >> Marcia >> [1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html >> >> On 9/5/11 10:25 PM, "Tom Baker"<tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote: >> >>> Yeah - won't work... But I share Karen's dislike of "entity". >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:56:05PM -0400, Jeff Young wrote: >>>> An RDF audience will read "individual" as an instance of any type. A >>>> library >>>> audience will possibly assume "individual" refers to an individual >>>> person. >>>> God help us. >>>> >>>> Jeff >>>> >>>> Tom Baker<tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 05:30:43PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: >>>>> so maybe: >>>>> >>>>> Among these are authority files, whose members identify individual >>>>> entities (I don't like that term), and controlled lists of values. >>>> >>>> Or simply: "whose members identify individuals"? Or does that >>>> imply too strongly "individual people"...? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 08:55:48 UTC