- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:25:29 -0400
- To: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Cc: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, public-xg-lld@w3.org
Yeah - won't work... But I share Karen's dislike of "entity". Tom On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 09:56:05PM -0400, Jeff Young wrote: > An RDF audience will read "individual" as an instance of any type. A library > audience will possibly assume "individual" refers to an individual person. > God help us. > > Jeff > > Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 05:30:43PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote: > > so maybe: > > > > Among these are authority files, whose members identify individual > > entities (I don't like that term), and controlled lists of values. > > Or simply: "whose members identify individuals"? Or does that > imply too strongly "individual people"...? > > >
Received on Tuesday, 6 September 2011 02:26:10 UTC