- From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:38:56 +0200
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Antoine, I feel exactly the same about this section, and though I've tried to re-write it a little, it is still too strong in my opinion. I'm very much in favor of merging the 2 sections ! Emma On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > Bouncing on that thread, I'd like to mention that the section immediately > following this one, "Library controlled vocabularies are expressed as text > strings", is slightly redundant, see: > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&oldid=6141#Library_data_is_expressed_primarily_as_text_strings > > I'm also not fond of the heading "Library controlled vocabularies are > expressed as text strings": the vocabularies as a whole are expressed as > structured data, even though this data relies on strings, mostly... > > Is there any objection to my trying to merge the two in the coming hours? > > Antoine > > >> I found the point "Library data is expressed primarily as text strings" to >> be >> vague as written, so I have sharpened the point [1] to emphasize the >> difference >> between "unique alphanumeric strings" such as ISBNs and "display-oriented >> text" >> such as "words and names". Please read the following paragraph and raise >> a >> flag if I have somehow "overinterpreted"...: >> >> Most information in library data is encoded as display-oriented text >> strings. Some of the resource identifiers used in library data are >> based on >> unique alphanumeric strings, such as ISBNs for books, but most >> identification is done using words and names. Some data fields in >> MARC >> records are coded uniquely, but there is no clear incentive to include >> these in all records as few of them are used for library-system >> functions. >> Some data fields, such as authority-controlled names and subjects, >> have >> associated records in separate files, and these records have >> identifiers >> that could be used to represent those entities in library metadata; >> however, the data formats in current use do not always support >> inclusion of >> these identifiers in records, so many of today's library systems do >> not >> properly support their use. >> >> Note "authority-controlled" with hyphen. >> >> Tom >> >> [1] >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_issues_page_take2&diff=6098&oldid=6090 >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 5 September 2011 08:39:24 UTC