- From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 10:01:27 -0400
- To: "'Emmanuelle Bermes'" <manue@figoblog.org>
- Cc: "'public-xg-lld'" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Regrets for both Kevin and me, we just got called to a meeting. --Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: public-xg-lld-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-lld-request@w3.org] > On Behalf Of William Waites > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 9:10 AM > To: Emmanuelle Bermes > Cc: public-xg-lld > Subject: Re: Agenda - May 26 2011 - LLD XG telecon - 1000 EDT > > Regrets from me, unfortunately I won't be able to make it, giving a > talk on linked data and libraries and such at edina.ac.uk. > > Two things that I would like to raise. To draw attention to the idea of > "implied datasets" that are a little bit like dark matter I think, > raised here, but motivated by an observation of the LLD sub-cloud: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011May/0121.html > > And secondly, working with some collegues on aligning BibJSON > (basically JSON variant of BibTeX) with JSON-LD, would it be reasonable > to do this in the context of the reborn LLD community group when this > happens? If it is reasonable, is there any chance of getting some of > the basic infrastructure in place (like mercurial repository and such) > before we actually transition or would this just introduce chaos into > the whole process? > > Cheers, > -w > -- > William Waites <mailto:ww@styx.org> > http://river.styx.org/ww/ <sip:ww@styx.org> > F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB 3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2011 14:02:00 UTC