Re: [UPDATE] Draft Use Case Deliverable

Hi Antoine,

Thank you very much for your answer, I totally agree with the approach you
propose.

Please find my answers inline

2011/5/11 Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for this impressive work! I like very much the direction it's
> taking.
>
> My question would be about the first part, i.e., the clustered scenarios.
> Are you working on them at the moment?
>

My plan was to start with that as soon as I got better background of the
UCs, their goals and structure (which I believe I have now), but as you
said, this is an important part and has to be stable for reviewers as soon
as possible.


It is an important one, and I guess it is difficult. There are also a number
> of "TBD" or "needs refinement" there. I think this is the part which could
> benefit most from reviews and/or contributions from cluster owners. Perhaps
> it would be therefore useful, to make it stable as early as possible, and
> have it reviewed then. In fact it could even be reviewed, while you still
> work on the individual case descriptions!
>

Totally agree. I'll give priority to these parts and contact the cluster
owners this week, in order to organize the work and fill in the existing
gaps. As soon as those parts are stable/ready for reviewers, I will go back
to the individual descriptions.

We could have a brief discussion on this during tomorrow's call, if you
> want.
>

I'm pleased to discuss it tomorrow, I will outline the next steps of my work
in order to get feedback from the group.

Cheers,

Daniel

>
> Antoine
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> I have just updated the wiki page hosting the UC deliverable draft:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport
>>
>> I have included short summaries for about 60% of the use cases:
>>
>> From:
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport#Use_Case_Bibliographic_Network
>>
>> To:
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCaseReport#Use_Case_Recollection
>> .
>>
>> This is just the first attempt to review them and the first approach to
>> the summaries, so they are neither 100% homogeneous nor 100% correct, some
>> of them are a bit too long and some others need a bit of rewriting but I
>> tried my best to keep them short and to put as many of the main ideas from
>> the original texts.
>>
>> I will try to complete the other 40% by the end of this week, so I can
>> start reviewing/rewriting/shortening the whole set by next week.
>>
>> I would truly appreciate if you could have a look, went through the
>> document and send me your opinions, and please feel free to edit any of the
>> short summaries, even if you are not the UC owner.
>>
>> Thank you very much for your help,
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>
>
>