- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 16:02:28 +0200
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- CC: public-lld@w3.org, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
On 5/3/11 3:57 PM, Ed Summers wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Antoine Isaac<aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: >> Could "HTTP URI" achieve a kind of balance between the two concerns here? > > Yes, this is definitely the right way to say it. It is in line with > timbl's Linked Data Design Issues document too [1] > >> Much more minor, about the CMS system section: is >> http://drupal.org/node/1089804 is a core reference here? > > Does it seem superfluous? I just wanted to point out that Drupal (a > very popular CMS) has RDF support now ... If you don't think it's > appropriate to mention it here please feel free to edit it out. No, on the contrary, I asked for it to be included, and Jeff has done it (thanks, Jeff!). I was just wondering whether the link I came with was the best one. I'm not a Drupal specialist, and have quite some trouble finding my way through the various RDF-related modules there... Antoine > > //Ed > > [1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 14:00:36 UTC