- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:56:31 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
> If people are willing to do the comments in the wiki (or don't mind them pasted there), that would work well. Shall we? You mean, allowing external comments into pages like http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Benefits ? That could make them quickly unreadable. I have not looked at all comments, but I know Ray's feedback alone would drastically impact on the display of the concerned page. > I'm envisioning forking pages (git-style) as a useful way future groups might wish to do reviews. Well, we can still do it if we want (cf other discussion). Antoine > > -Jodi > > On 21 Jun 2011, at 19:15, Antoine Isaac wrote: > >> Ah, I was also thinking about that. >> >> But my preference would have been for a centralized version, by adapting http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/DraftReportReviewerAssignments (like, changing the last column into "reviewers and reviews"). >> >> Antoine >> >> >>> I was thinking that exact thing, but hadn't gotten to it yet. I will do what I can with the comments from the Benefits section. >>> >>> kc >>> >>> Quoting Jodi Schneider<jodi.schneider@deri.org>: >>> >>>> I'm having trouble keeping track of the various and useful feedback we've been getting in early reviews. For the current version, where we're receiving feedback via email, it would be helpful to link feedback to the wiki page(s) being commented on. >>>> >>>> A natural way to do this would be to paste the email message URI onto the wiki talk page. >>>> >>>> It could be done each email as received (but there aren't URIs to the archive) or by going down the public-xg-lld and public-lld archives. >>>> I'd be grateful if anybody has the time to take this on! >>>> >>>> -Jodi >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 08:18:00 UTC