- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 21:03:49 +0200
- To: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Time to forward Dickson's comment on the recommendation/curriculum topic. Sorry for the delay, everyone. And thanks Tom for reminding it. And of course to Dickson for spending time reading this section. The point Dickson felt that we need to make is: "Migrating the Library Data to LOD is only the first stage, since there are considerable initiative among practictioners (especialy institutions like ZBW, Kiel) that are developing framework and technologies to enable the dataset used for experiements reported in a 'paper' is also made availabe as LOD, also the "modal" used by the authors to process the data. With the 'paper', "dataset" and 'model' all represented in LOD (using appropriate vocabuary (and formalisems), researchers arround the world can replicate the experiment conducted by the authors of the paper, as well as utilise the dataset with different 'models'. If this practice is adopted (which I think will take place in the very near future, with varying degree of sophistication from domains to domain), research rigor will excellerate, and overall assessment of research reports outlined in the papers will be transparent, and can be validated by piers."
Received on Thursday, 21 July 2011 19:02:49 UTC