- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 01:30:37 +0100
- To: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- CC: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, "gordon@gordondunsire.com" <gordon@gordondunsire.com>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>, Joe Provenzano <provenzano@wis.edu>
On 1/21/11 4:10 PM, Jodi Schneider wrote: > > On 19 Jan 2011, at 12:20, Thomas Baker wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:57:28PM -0500, Thomas Baker wrote: >>> Maybe the bottom of the screen could continually show a narrow >>> window of triples scrolling up and down, sometimes faster, >>> sometimes slower, pausing to highlight a subject here, finding >>> a matching object there. When a match is found, then, show the >>> match above the triples window by zooming out on the current >>> photo or book, placing it to the left, placing the object >>> on the right, adding a predicate between the two to describe >>> the connection. Once this has been narrated, zoom in on the >>> object resource so that it takes up the whole screen while >>> triples resume scrolling in the window below in the search >>> for the next random or instructive connection. >> >> Hmm, maybe Subject, Predicate, and Object could >> spin, and stop, like the reels of a slot machine. > > This image resonates with me! > >> While they're spinning, they scroll through thousands >> of triples in a blur; when they stop, they lock in >> on one or more triples. Instead of cherries and lemons, >> the reels could show thumbnail images, or the center >> reel could show a predicate. > > Dan Chudnov has a nice presentation aimed at librarians called "better living through linking". > > Particularly the example (slides 39-49, plus a "linked up" example in slide 60): > http://www.slideshare.net/dchud/tcdl-2009-keynote-better-living-through-linking/39 > > I think the overall message is one of islands of resources getting connected up. That will need to be made explicit with some map-like image, I think. >> >> If people want to keep the list focused on our real >> work I'd be happy to take this offline... > > I think this *is* part of our real work. We've gotten far enough to storyboard it, I think. Can we make storyboarding, rather than the video, the planned outcome of *our* work, and trust that others will take it further, if we run out of time? +1. It was indeed the idea that if members of the XG would contribute anything, it would be rather the storyboard. By the way I do find the new ideas interesting--I seem to remember Europeana had a video like that done once, where connections were being made between various unexpected objects--but would that be as easy for the kids&instructors from that school Tom had contact with? Hmm, seems we need a productor to synch all that ;-) Antoine
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2011 00:29:06 UTC