- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 07:10:44 -0800
- To: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Cc: "gordon@gordondunsire.com" <gordon@gordondunsire.com>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>, Joe Provenzano <provenzano@wis.edu>
- Message-Id: <EF56E82D-ED1B-4EE3-A5A9-C52AAAD168B0@deri.org>
On 19 Jan 2011, at 12:20, Thomas Baker wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:57:28PM -0500, Thomas Baker wrote: >> Maybe the bottom of the screen could continually show a narrow >> window of triples scrolling up and down, sometimes faster, >> sometimes slower, pausing to highlight a subject here, finding >> a matching object there. When a match is found, then, show the >> match above the triples window by zooming out on the current >> photo or book, placing it to the left, placing the object >> on the right, adding a predicate between the two to describe >> the connection. Once this has been narrated, zoom in on the >> object resource so that it takes up the whole screen while >> triples resume scrolling in the window below in the search >> for the next random or instructive connection. > > Hmm, maybe Subject, Predicate, and Object could > spin, and stop, like the reels of a slot machine. This image resonates with me! > While they're spinning, they scroll through thousands > of triples in a blur; when they stop, they lock in > on one or more triples. Instead of cherries and lemons, > the reels could show thumbnail images, or the center > reel could show a predicate. Dan Chudnov has a nice presentation aimed at librarians called "better living through linking". Particularly the example (slides 39-49, plus a "linked up" example in slide 60): http://www.slideshare.net/dchud/tcdl-2009-keynote-better-living-through-linking/39 I think the overall message is one of islands of resources getting connected up. That will need to be made explicit with some map-like image, I think. > > If people want to keep the list focused on our real > work I'd be happy to take this offline... I think this *is* part of our real work. We've gotten far enough to storyboard it, I think. Can we make storyboarding, rather than the video, the planned outcome of *our* work, and trust that others will take it further, if we run out of time? -Jodi > > Tom > > -- > Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de> >
Received on Friday, 21 January 2011 15:12:18 UTC