- From: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:55:12 +0100
- To: "public-xg-lld" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi,
Maybe one of you - from the VocAlign Cluster, especially ;) - has dealt with this?
Any hints are appreciated -
Cheers, Joachim
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: semantic-web-request@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Neubert Joachim
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2011 14:11
An: Semantic-web@w3.org
Betreff: "zero relations" in dataset mappings (has no matching entity in)
When matching and mapping two datasets, it is common that - on both sides - you find entities which don't have a matching entity on the other side.
When that non-matching was verified intellectually, it could be valuable to report this fact - especially to keep track of "false positives"
(e.g. matching labels, but different concepts in SKOS systems).
Basically, this states a relation between an entity - e.g., a skos:Concept - and a set of entities - as defined e.g. by a skos:ConceptScheme or a void:Dataset.
Are you aware of any pattern to express this in RDF?
I consider coining something like
ext:noMatchingEntity rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:note .
Since the date of the above mentioned verification should be reported, you could end up along the lines the following example
<http://d-nb.info/gnd/4125416-8> ext:noMatchingEntity
[ rdf:value <http://zbw.eu/stw> ;
dcterms:modified "2010-01-25"^^xsd:date ] .
What do you think?
Cheers, Joachim
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 13:55:47 UTC