- From: Tom Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
- Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:00:54 -0400
- To: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- Cc: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>, public-xg-lld@w3.org
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:44:27AM +0200, Joachim Neubert wrote: > my first idea about this was not technical at all. Even if you have only a > sheet of paper with an overview, which properties are used, and about > possible restrictions (mandatory, cardinality, etc) imposed on the data in > the source (legacy) sytstems, this can be extremely helpful for dealing with > the data. +1 completely agree. > More real and formally validatable control is better, of cause. And as the > text is phrased now, it gives the hints to the general idea, and to a formal > implementation in the Singapore Framework as well (where the reader can buy > in or not). If, in your reading, the text conveys the general idea (above) while pointing to a more formalized specification (where the reader can buy in or not), then I am happy because that is precisely what I meant. Tom
Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 11:01:27 UTC