- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 08:52:40 -0700
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
1) Exposure of controlled vocabularies is fairly advanced, while presentation of bibliographic data is just beginning. 2) replace "difficulties" with "challenges"? Or maybe emphasize challenges for those on the cutting edge. kc Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>: > Hi Jodi, > > Thanks a lot for reading once again the report! > On the "data" stuff: > > >> ==DATA AVAILABILITY== >> 1) "More has been done on value vocabularies and element sets than >> on bibliographic datasets" -- The "more has been done" doesn't >> sound very good to my ears. Could we rephrase this? The best I can >> come up with is "Bibliographic datasets have received less work >> than value vocabularies and element sets"? > > > How about "Bibliographic datasets have received less attention than > value vocabularies and element sets" > http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_As_Current_Situation&diff=5827&oldid=5824 > >> ===MORE HAS BEEN DONE ON VALUE VOCABULARIES AND ELEMENT SETS THAN >> ON BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATASETS=== >> 1) "Examples such the release of the British National Bibliography >> show that there are indeed considerable difficulties involved (many >> discussed in this report). However, this proves not deterring >> enough, and the number of datasets released as linked data keeps >> increasing at a fast pace." >> >> I think the difficulties need to either be directly mentioned, or a >> report from the BNB mentioned; otherwise this stands as a caution >> against adopting LLD. > Like this one? > http://consulting.talis.com/case-study/british-library-explores-linked-data/ > > >> Draft Vocabularies Datasets As Current Situation >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_As_Current_Situation&diff=5808&oldid=5779 > >> Draft Vocabularies Datasets Section2 >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section2&diff=5816&oldid=5796 > > > Thanks a lot! > > Cheers > > Antoine > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 15:53:09 UTC