- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 07:54:30 -0700
- To: public-xg-lld@w3.org
I'm not sure that people expected answers. I commented on some of the comments, but my guess is that the folks who commented are not going back there looking for a discussion (although some discussion between people did take place). What type of answers were you thinking of sending? Is it mainly: thank you for your comments? or will it specifically say what action was taken? kc Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>: > Sorry the subject is not so clear: I meant: answering the comments > we received via the blog. (not mandatorily answering via the blog) > > Antoine > > >> Hi, >> >> We're in the process of reacting to the comments we've received by >> the blog on the (former) "available vocabularies and datasets" >> sections. I was wondering about whether to send public answers to >> the commenters, such as the draft below for Alan Danskin from >> British Library. >> >> This seems doable for that section, as the amount of comments is >> not so high. And Marcia, Jeff and William are already discussing by >> email (and thus internally keeping track of) the changes we make, >> anyway. >> >> But if we know already that answers cannot be made to every >> commenter, then it's maybe better to send private answers. Also, if >> we cc answers to public-lld, this may result in too high traffic >> for the occasional reader. Again I think it's ok for the "available >> vocabularies and datasets" sections, but I don't realize what the >> situation is for the other ones. >> >> Any opinion? >> >> Antoine >> >> ----- >> >> Dear Alan, >> >> We've seen with great pleasure that you have commented on the >> "Available Vocabularies and Datasets" section [1] of the Library >> Linked Data report. This is helpful feedback, thanks a lot! >> To try to address come of your comments, we've in particular: >> >> - made some more mentions to the BNB effort: >> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/index.php?title=Draft_Vocabularies_Datasets_Section&diff=5672&oldid=5669 >> >> - added the BNB CKAN package to the CKAN LLD group [2], which will >> cause it to appear in our Side deliverable (draft at [2]) >> >> - updated our small description of LCSH >> >> It is possible that the current organization of the report will be >> changed, as a result of other comments we received on other >> sections. The points above will however make their way in the final >> version, one way or the other. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Antoine >> >> >> [1] >> http://blogs.ukoln.ac.uk/w3clld/2011/06/26/available-vocabularies-and-datasets/ >> [2] http://ckan.net/group/lld >> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Vocabulary_and_Dataset >> >> > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Sunday, 14 August 2011 14:55:09 UTC