- From: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:59:08 +0200
- To: Kai Eckert <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de>
- Cc: public-xg-lld@w3.org
Sorry, as I wrote that, I just discovered that this wasn't implemented yet. So now, we have a Scope page [1] and a Benefits page [2], separate. I also updated both transclusions (and strongly advocate that we deprecate one in favor of the other ;-) [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Scope [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Benefits On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Emmanuelle Bermes <manue@figoblog.org> wrote: > Thanks Kai for proposing your contribution. > This definition doesn't fit in the Benefits section though, but in > Scope. The 2 are now separate. > > Emma > > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Kai Eckert > <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >>> I agree with Karen: we could use some more precise wording here. Adrian >>> not having answered my request for a link, so I went and dig up the OKFN >>> definitions myself. There is ready-made stuff to re-use at >>> http://www.opendefinition.org/, especially: >>> - http://www.opendefinition.org/bibliographic/ >>> - http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/#Data >>> >>> In fact I was thinking we could include "Open data" as a separate point >>> (next to Library data, Linked Data and Library Linked Data), re-using >>> *and pointing* to the OKFN page(s). >>> >> >> I think that is a very good idea and I also consider it absolutely necessary >> to state something about linked and open data. I volunteer to add such a >> section to the benefits section tomorrow, if noone opposes. >> >> I will reread the report, too, and see, if other sections need some >> rewording or clarification. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Kai >> >> -- >> Kai Eckert >> Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim >> Stellv. Leiter Abteilung Digitale Bibliotheksdienste >> Schloss Schneckhof West / 68131 Mannheim >> Tel. 0621/181-2946 Fax 0621/181-2918 >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 11 August 2011 15:59:45 UTC