- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:16:15 +0100
- To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <B503D448-EBD3-43F5-BBAB-10D6225D967B@deri.org>
On 20 Apr 2011, at 11:57, Antoine Isaac wrote: >> Another topic that the report may need to cover is *finding* vocabularies; one challenge raised by the issues/recommendations subgroup is finding and selecting general-purpose vocabularies. Beyond places and persons (which are well-covered in your draft) there are events (maybe in CIDOC CRM? If so, more details on that could help!), measurements, colors, etc. > > > If we manage to find categories for our items, this may be a first answer. But maybe you are refering to something else, such as giving some more guidance/pointers on tools such as http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Category:Search_Engine ? Yes, as well as pointers to vocabulary registries. In order to avoid an "RDF silo" of LLD we need to use existing vocabularies -- but that requires knowing what they are, as we describe in the recommendations draft here: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Draft_issues_page#Identify_vocabularies_that_are_needed_to_support_the_creation_and_use_of_LLD_.5BJS.5D I was thinking of categories with the novice audience in mind--because one possible outcome is a "lookup table" of some common vocabularies, or at least something that would be easy to scan visually as a reference. I agree that categorizing is challenging! :) -Jodi
Received on Wednesday, 20 April 2011 11:16:45 UTC