- From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:19:45 +0200
- To: Emmanuelle Bermes <manue.fig@gmail.com>
- CC: "gordon@gordondunsire.com" <gordon@gordondunsire.com>, Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>, public-xg-lld@w3.org
Hi everyone, OK, I've added my name to fill some gaps at the top. I don't know if I'll be a good champion, but they won't be orphan cases at least ;-) On the clustering, I agree with the principle, but it looks like it should pretty soon end up with cases appearing at many places. I'm looking forward to seeing and discussing this live! Cheers, Antoine > Good point, Gordon : grouping the Use Cases in clusters in probably > the only way we can have an overview on all of them during the F2F. > > As for how to group them, a first attempt is on the UC vs. Topics list at [1]. > I've edited the list to include all the short names for topics that > Karen has created in the Topics page [2]. The intention is to use it > to evaluate the UC coverage. > > A lot of UCs (all those arrived during the last week) are not > classified in the UC vs. Topics list. It would be great if UC > providers, Topics creators and UC presenters could check the list, and > add "their" UC where they fit better with respect to Topics. (By the > way that's a pending Action in our agenda). > > Jodi's suggestion to use wiki Categories for the Topics seems a very > good idea to me, not only because it'll help keep track of the topics, > but because we would end with 1 wiki page for each topic, possibly > with a more elaborated description than what we have in the Topics > List, containing links to relevant Use Case. Categories can be > organised in sub-categories easily. > However that would be a significant work to create this, so probably > better after the Topics discussion planned during the F2F, where we'll > have a chance to identify missing topics and irrelevant topics. > > Emmanuelle > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/UseCasesVsTopics#Use_Cases_vs._Topics.2C_list_view > [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Topics > > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:32 AM, gordon@gordondunsire.com > <gordon@gordondunsire.com> wrote: >> Tom and others: >> >> >> >> I've removed two duplicates from the list (both from Germany). >> >> >> >> I've signed up to a few more. I don't intend (if no-one insists on being the >> presenter for some of these instead of me) to present the UCs one-by-one, >> but in at least two clusters: bibliographic record >> exchange/sharing/merging/access; and services requiring vocabulary control >> (Marcia and Karen have signed up for some UCs which also belong to this >> general cluster). Each UC will be mentioned, with salient factors, but I >> hope to generalise the common points for discussion. This approach also >> implies that presentations of UCs should be in clusters, not in the order >> given in the wiki, for example. >> >> >> >> And I expect we'll have further discussion about ensuring that each UC gets >> aired, but at the same time avoiding duplication, at DC-2101 before the >> LLDXG f2f. >> >> >> >> Looking forward to seeing everyone in a couple of days. >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> Gordon >> >> >> >> On 16 October 2010 at 15:06 Thomas Baker<tbaker@tbaker.de> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:09:00PM +0100, Jodi Schneider wrote: >>>> Many thanks, Asgeir! This use case is now on the LLD wiki: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Pode >>>> >>>> Thanks also for sharing the documentation and code links! They're now >>>> listed in 'further reading' in the use case. >>> >>> First of all, a big round of applause for Jodi for staying >>> on top of the flurry of use case submissions that have come >>> in over the past three days! >>> >>> We now have thirty-eight use cases on the agenda [1]. With >>> just two 90-minute sessions, which works out as follows: >>> >>> 180 minutes / 38 use cases, i.e.: >>> >>> under 5 minutes per use case...! >>> >>> Of the 38 use cases, 17 remain unclaimed by "presenters". >>> In order to ensure we have full coverage for the discussion: >>> >>> -- 5 participants have signed up for two or more - great! >>> >>> -- 8 participants have signed up for one - would you consider >>> signing up for a second? >>> >>> -- 6 participants have not yet signed up for any use cases. >>> Everyone should please lead the discussion on at least one >>> case. >>> >>> Please sign up by adding your name after a use case at [1]... >>> >>> Tom >>> >>> [1] >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh#Use_case_discussion_9:00-10:30_.2B_11:00-12:30 >>> >>> -- >>> Tom Baker<tbaker@tbaker.de> >>> > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 13:20:22 UTC