- From: Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 15:49:19 +0000
- To: Ed Summers <ehs@pobox.com>
- Cc: Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl>, Kai Eckert <kai@informatik.uni-mannheim.de>, Asaf Bartov <asaf.bartov@gmail.com>, public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Forwarding part of an earlier conversation... On 8 Nov 2010, at 12:56, Ed Summers wrote: > I agree with Kai, there are certainly aspects to the Enhanced > Publications Case Study (aka Use Case) that involve citation...but I > can also see why you in the Digital Objects group would want to use > it. I guess I don't understand why particular use cases need to be > "owned" by a particular cluster... I think the main reason is to make sure we don't lose track of any of the use cases. > but if you are eager to use it > please feel free to. > > I really don't have any idea what we are supposed to be doing as far > as writing up something about the cluster. But I guess I'll wait to > hear more instructions from the chairs. FWIW, I also don't like having > this conversations off of the discussion list. ccing the list. :) -Jodi > > //Ed > > On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Mark van Assem <mark@cs.vu.nl> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Great, so I'll keep shepherding EP within our cluster. >> >> We also found that the scholarly debate UC (in your cluster) is not clear on >> whether they have accomplished creating the relationships they propose, or >> want to do it in the future. We have not found data confirming the former, >> you might want to contact the UC owner. >> >> Best, >> Mark >> >> On 05/11/2010 18:34, Kai Eckert wrote: >>> >>> Hi Mark and all, >>> >>> sorry for the late response, but I was totally busy since my return from >>> Pittsburgh, so I had no time to think about our cluster todos yet. >>> >>> I agree with you, this basically reflects my problems with the proper >>> classification of the scientific data use case. I think we should define >>> the cluster by specific aspects and the use-cases (which in fact are >>> more case-studies and whole scenarioes instead of use-cases, but I >>> repeat myself ;-)) probably most of the time contain more than one aspect. >>> >>> So our cluster should be restricted to the pure citation aspect, and >>> citation at least means citation of two different things: other >>> publications and additional reference materials, like scientific data or >>> others, as mentioned in the EP use-case. >>> >>> So we probably will have some use-cases in common, the scientific data >>> use-case should also be split in this manner and handed over to you, >>> regarding the proper description of scientific data (or maybe to someone >>> else, this is only based on my recall of the clusters, haven't >>> investigated them further...). >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Kai >>> >>> Am 29.10.2010 14:47, schrieb Mark van Assem: >>>> >>>> Hi Kai and Ed, >>>> >>>> We from the Digital Objects cluster (Jodi, Asaf, Mark) thought it >>>> would be useful to keep in contact with you as these clusters seem to >>>> overlap a bit. >>>> >>>> For example, I think that the EP UC belongs in our cluster [1], would >>>> you agree? >>>> >>>> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Enhanced_Publications >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Mark. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 15:49:59 UTC