- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 12:27:54 -0500
- To: "Emmanuelle Bermes" <manue.fig@gmail.com>, "Mark van Assem" <mark@cs.vu.nl>
- Cc: "Thomas Baker" <tbaker@tbaker.de>, "public-xg-lld" <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
The OWL solution would be for DC to coin owl:DatatypeProperties and owl:ObjectProperties as rdfs:subPropertyOf of their existing rdf:Properties. As distasteful as that is, I assume that rules-based alternatives will be ignored. Jeff > Another question about RELATE(existing) : > relationships may exist in the data but be totally implicit. If you > make them explicit, is it a new relationship, or an existing one ? > Example (very simplified) : > > (implicit relationship) > http://example.com/book1 dc:creator "J.R.R. Tolkien" > http://example.com/book2 dc:creator "J.R.R.Tolkien" > http://viaf.org/viaf/95218067 foaf:name "Tolkien, J.R.R. (John Ronald > Reuel), 1892-1973" > > (same relationship made explicit) > http://example.com/book1 dc:creator http://viaf.org/viaf/95218067 > http://example.com/book2 dc:creator http://viaf.org/viaf/95218067 > http://viaf.org/viaf/95218067 foaf:name "Tolkien, J.R.R. (John Ronald > Reuel), 1892-1973"
Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 17:29:06 UTC