- From: Jim <Jim@haynes-barnett.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 11:55:23 -0400
- To: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4F7B1D6B.1090405@haynes-barnett.net>
I second Milan's proposal. Genesys is interested in this effort iff network speech services are included in its scope. - Jim Barnett On 4/3/2012 11:48 AM, Young, Milan wrote: > > The proposal mentions that the specification of a network speech > protocol is out of scope. This makes sense given that protocols are > the domain of the IETF. > > But I'd like to confirm that the use of network speech services are in > scope for this CG. Would you mind amending the proposal to make this > explicit? > > Thanks > > *From:*Glen Shires [mailto:gshires@google.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 03, 2012 8:13 AM > *To:* public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org; public-webapps@w3.org > *Subject:* Speech API Community Group > > We at Google have proposed the formation of a new "Speech API > Community Group" to pursue a JavaScript Speech API. We encourage you > to join and support this effort. [1] > > We believe that forming a Community Group has the following advantages: > > - It's quick, efficient and minimizes unnecessary process overhead. > > - We believe it will allow us, as a group, to reach consensus in > an efficient manner. > > - We hope it will expedite interoperable implementations in > multiple browsers. (A good example is the Web Media Text Tracks CG, > where multiple implementations are happening quickly.) > > Google plans to supply an implementation and a test suite for > this specification, and will commit to serve as editor. We hope that > others will support this CG as they had stated support for the similar > WebApps CfC. [2] > > Bjorn Bringert > > Satish Sampath > > Glen Shires > > [1] http://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/#speech-api > > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/0315.html >
Received on Tuesday, 3 April 2012 18:32:39 UTC