protocol notes 7/21/2011

We finished reviewing the draft. I've attached the annotated version with all the feedback recorded. I will create a second draft to incorporate all the feedback, with a tentative ETA of next week.



Next week, we should review the requirements document http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Jul/att-0023/Protocol_requirements_draft_-_RB.htm. I'd at least like to cover these topics:

1) The current draft doesn't have any explicit support for re-reco. Is it already there with headers like waveform-URI?

2) Does re-reco make sense for anything other than one-shot recognition?

3) How is the security of retained audio supposed to work?
4) We're assuming that EMMA can be consistently mapped by the API to other data structures (e.g. arrays of results). Is this a reasonable assumption?