Re: R26. There should exist a high quality default speech recognition visual user interface.

On 11/16/2010 05:36 PM, Bjorn Bringert wrote:
> That sounds good, but we probably shouldn't be restricting it to a
> visual interface at all. Non-visual user agents should also provide a
> default user interface for speech recognition, and we don't need to
> require that the speech recognition interface is visual even in visual
> user agents.
>
> So how about:
>
> "User agents must provide a default interface to control speech recognition."


Sounds good.


-Olli


>
> /Bjorn
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Deborah Dahl
> <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>  wrote:
>> I agree that it would be good if we can avoid addressing what the user interface to speech recognition control should look like or how it should be operated. But, as you say, it would be reasonable for the eventual spec to define what features the UA must provide, although I don't think we want to get into the specifics of that now.
>> I think the intent of your proposed rewording is reasonable, but it seems a little indirect. Would something like this be clearer?
>> "User agents that include a visual display must provide a default visual interface to control speech recognition."
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-
>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Bringert
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:05 AM
>>> To: Deborah Dahl
>>> Cc: Olli@pettay.fi; public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: R26. There should exist a high quality default speech recognition
>>> visual user interface.
>>>
>>> I don't think that we have to address what the user interface should
>>> be. That should be up to user agent implementors. In the eventual
>>> spec, we just need to specify what web apps can expect, and what
>>> minimum features user agents must provide. Maybe an alternative
>>> phrasing would be:
>>>
>>> "Web applications should not be forced to provide their own visual
>>> interface for controlling speech recognition."
>>>
>>> /Bjorn
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Deborah Dahl
>>> <dahl@conversational-technologies.com>  wrote:
>>>> I think Olli's wording is a little clearer.
>>>> I think we need something like this, especially in the development phase.
>>> However, I think there's a danger that we might get bogged down in "high
>>> quality", especially if we think that "high quality" includes "visually
>>> appealing". I think "informative" and "usable" would be better descriptions.
>>>> Also, a high-quality, or  even just informative and usable, default visual
>>> interface will need to be different for different devices, depending on screen
>>> size, keyboard, touchscreen vs. mouse, availability of physical buttons, etc.
>>> We can't address every device, so should we just focus on one or two major
>>> devices, like desktop browser and "generic small-screen device"?
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-
>>> htmlspeech-
>>>>> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Olli Pettay
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:02 AM
>>>>> To: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: R26. There should exist a high quality default speech
>>> recognition
>>>>> visual user interface.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/16/2010 12:52 PM, Bjorn Bringert wrote:
>>>>>> Keep.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree.
>>>>> Though the wording of the requirement is a bit strange.
>>>>> Had to read
>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Nov/att-
>>>>> 0102/requirements.html#r26
>>>>> to understand it fully.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could something like this work better:
>>>>> "There should exist a high quality default visual user interface for the
>>>>> speech recognition."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Olli
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Dan Burnett<dburnett@voxeo.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Group,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on
>>> our
>>>>>>> ranking approach [1].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and
>>>>>>> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 26 [2].
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting.
>>>>> Outstanding
>>>>>>> points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming
>>> teleconference.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- dan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-
>>>>> htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-
>>>>> 0001/speech.html#r26
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bjorn Bringert
>>> Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham
>>> Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ
>>> Registered in England Number: 3977902
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2010 15:59:57 UTC