RE: R8. Web application must be able to specify language of recognition.

I mostly agree.  The only wrinkle is if you are allowed multiple grammars and different languages are specified in each grammar what should happen?  Should it fail?  Should it do one recognition for each language and return a bunch of results?  Do multiple recognition but return one result?  Do one recognition in the language of one of the grammars and use the foreign language grammars in the "native" language picked?

One can imagine specifying the language of the recognition separately from the grammar in question and then it either being an error if foreign grammars are specified, or else foreign grammars are ignored, or else you make a best effort with foreign grammars.

This may get more into the proposal details and edge cases, but I think this is sort of what the R8 requirement gets at.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robert Brown
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 5:35 PM
To: Dan Burnett; public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Subject: RE: R8. Web application must be able to specify language of recognition.

This one feels redundant.  SRGS specifies the language.  And while an application will probably also need to specify a particular recognition resource based on the language it wants to recognize, this logic might be best left to the application.  These requirements are already covered (SRGS, and specifying what resource to use).  Are there other reasons for this requirement?

-----Original Message-----
From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dan Burnett
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 3:24 PM
To: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Subject: R8. Web application must be able to specify language of recognition.

Group,

This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on our ranking approach [1].

This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 8 [2].

Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting.   
Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at the next teleconference.

-- dan

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r8

Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 08:02:04 UTC