- From: Satish Sampath <satish@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 23:02:42 +0100
- To: Robert Brown <Robert.Brown@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, "public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org" <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
A set of use cases which clearly describe what 'end user extensions' mean would help in deciding whether they should be in scope or out of scope of our work. I believe Eric Johansson suggested these requirements initially. Eric, can you help us with a few use cases for these requirements? Cheers Satish On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Robert Brown <Robert.Brown@microsoft.com> wrote: > I agree on R21. This seems like something some user agents may want to > implement, but I don’t think it’s a requirement. Out of scope. > > > > As for R19, I’m not really sure what that means. A use-case example would > help. > > > > From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Bringert > Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 1:32 PM > To: Dan Burnett > Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org > Subject: Re: R21. Any public interface for creating extensions should be > speakable > > > > I think that R21 is intended to be understood in the context of R19: "End > user extensions should be available both on desktop and in cloud." In my > opinion, what we should specify is mainly about the web app APIs for using > speech recognition. Extra features that user agents offer to end users > without involving the web application are out of scope. > > > > R21 expands R19 to require end user extensions to be speakable. I think that > both these requirements should be considered out of scope since they are > outside the web app / user agent / speech service interfaces. > > > > /Bjorn > > > > On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:24 PM, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote: > > Group, > > This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on our > ranking approach [1]. > > This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and > opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 21 [2]. > > Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. Outstanding > points of contention will be discussed live at the next teleconference. > > -- dan > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r21 > > > -- > Bjorn Bringert > Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace > Road, London, SW1W 9TQ > Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2010 22:03:12 UTC