- From: Michael Bodell <mbodell@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:23:44 +0000
- To: Robert Brown <Robert.Brown@microsoft.com>, "Olli@pettay.fi" <Olli@pettay.fi>, Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- CC: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, "public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org" <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
Sounds like we have consensus to drop this. -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robert Brown Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 1:24 PM To: Olli@pettay.fi; Bjorn Bringert Cc: Dan Burnett; public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org Subject: RE: R19. End user extensions should be available both on desktop and in cloud I think that's right. It originally came from Eric's post in September: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Sep/0015.html In that context, it seems to be about a specific style of application that could be built with the API, rather than the API itself. So I agree it's out of scope. -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Olli Pettay Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 3:57 AM To: Bjorn Bringert Cc: Dan Burnett; public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org Subject: Re: R19. End user extensions should be available both on desktop and in cloud On 12/08/2010 01:46 PM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > I believe that "extensions" here means things like browser extensions > and user-added speech commands for controlling the browser. Ok, if R19 is about those, also then it is out of scope. -Olli I think > that those things are user agent specific features and out of scope > for the HTML Speech XG. > > /Bjorn > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Olli Pettay<Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: >> I don't understand R19. >> What extensions? >> >> If this is about alternative speech engines, then sure, user can >> install new engines locally and then the browser would just use them. >> And similarly user could just make browser to point to some other >> remote speech engine. But that all is about UA and how user can use >> UA, not anything we should define. >> >> But perhaps R19 is about something else? >> >> >> -Olli >> >> >> >> On 12/08/2010 12:41 PM, Dan Burnett wrote: >>> >>> Group, >>> >>> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based >>> on our ranking approach [1]. >>> >>> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, >>> and opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 19 [2]. >>> >>> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >>> Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an >>> upcoming teleconference. >>> >>> -- dan >>> >>> [1] >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/002 >>> 4.html >>> [2] >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att >>> -0001/speech.html#r19 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 07:24:25 UTC