- From: Michael Bodell <mbodell@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:23:37 +0000
- To: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>, "Olli@pettay.fi" <Olli@pettay.fi>
- CC: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, "public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org" <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
Yeah, I think it is different enough from FPR17 that we should keep it. Sounds like consensus. -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Bringert Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 4:39 AM To: Olli@pettay.fi Cc: Dan Burnett; public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org Subject: Re: R32. End users need a clear indication whenever microphone is listening to the user We also have this, which is closely related: FPR17. While capture is happening, there must be an obvious way for the user to abort the capture and recognition process. But I think that it's fine to keep R32 as well. /Bjorn On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: > We should keep this. > > -Olli > > > On 12/08/2010 12:38 PM, Dan Burnett wrote: >> >> Group, >> >> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based >> on our ranking approach [1]. >> >> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, >> and opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 32 [2]. >> >> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >> Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an >> upcoming teleconference. >> >> -- dan >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024 >> .html >> [2] >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att- >> 0001/speech.html#r32 >> >> >> >> > > > -- Bjorn Bringert Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 07:24:12 UTC