- From: Michael Bodell <mbodell@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 07:23:34 +0000
- To: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- CC: "public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org" <public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org>
I think that wording is fine. We can confirm if we have group consensus on that on the call. -----Original Message----- From: public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org [mailto:public-xg-htmlspeech-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjorn Bringert Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 2:48 AM To: Dan Burnett Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org Subject: Re: R11. Web application author must integrate input from multiple modalities As worded, the requirement is absurd (requiring all web apps to use integrated multimodality), but that is probably just a typo. I think that the intention and the description in the requirements docs are fine. How about this fixed wording: "Web applications must be able to integrate input from multiple modalities" /Bjorn On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> wrote: > Group, > > This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based > on our ranking approach [1]. > > This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and > opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 11 [2]. > > Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. > Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming teleconference. > > -- dan > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024. > html > [2] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0 > 001/speech.html#r11 > > -- Bjorn Bringert Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 07:24:35 UTC