- From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:26:11 -0500
- To: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
Actually, I don't like this wording. This is more a requirement that touches on either a) the kind of information that must be made available to the web application, or b) the way in which such information is made available to the web application. Perhaps wording like this would be better: "The User Agent and protocol must not prevent web applications from integrating input from multiple modalities." -- dan On Dec 3, 2010, at 5:48 AM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > As worded, the requirement is absurd (requiring all web apps to use > integrated multimodality), but that is probably just a typo. I think > that the intention and the description in the requirements docs are > fine. How about this fixed wording: > > "Web applications must be able to integrate input from multiple > modalities" > > /Bjorn > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 10:40 AM, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> > wrote: >> Group, >> >> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize >> based on our >> ranking approach [1]. >> >> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, >> and >> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 11 [2]. >> >> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >> Outstanding >> points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming >> teleconference. >> >> -- dan >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r11 >> >> > > > > -- > Bjorn Bringert > Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham > Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ > Registered in England Number: 3977902 >
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2010 16:26:46 UTC