- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 13:57:01 +0200
- To: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- CC: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>, public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
On 12/08/2010 01:46 PM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > I believe that "extensions" here means things like browser extensions > and user-added speech commands for controlling the browser. Ok, if R19 is about those, also then it is out of scope. -Olli I think > that those things are user agent specific features and out of scope > for the HTML Speech XG. > > /Bjorn > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Olli Pettay<Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> wrote: >> I don't understand R19. >> What extensions? >> >> If this is about alternative speech engines, then sure, user can install >> new engines locally and then the browser would just use them. >> And similarly user could just make browser to point to some other >> remote speech engine. But that all is about UA and how user can use UA, >> not anything we should define. >> >> But perhaps R19 is about something else? >> >> >> -Olli >> >> >> >> On 12/08/2010 12:41 PM, Dan Burnett wrote: >>> >>> Group, >>> >>> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize based on >>> our ranking approach [1]. >>> >>> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, and >>> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 19 [2]. >>> >>> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >>> Outstanding points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming >>> teleconference. >>> >>> -- dan >>> >>> [1] >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html >>> [2] >>> >>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r19 >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2010 11:57:38 UTC