- From: Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 08:38:51 -0500
- To: Bjorn Bringert <bringert@google.com>
- Cc: public-xg-htmlspeech@w3.org
It appears that we have consensus on the need for this requirement. However, it is not clear whether we need it in addition to FPR3. We will clarify this on today's teleconference. -- dan On Dec 1, 2010, at 3:49 PM, Bjorn Bringert wrote: > Seems reasonable. > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Dan Burnett <dburnett@voxeo.com> > wrote: >> Group, >> >> This is the next of the requirements to discuss and prioritize >> based on our >> ranking approach [1]. >> >> This email is the beginning of a thread for questions, discussion, >> and >> opinions regarding our first draft of Requirement 10 [2]. >> >> Please discuss via email as we agreed at the Lyon f2f meeting. >> Outstanding >> points of contention will be discussed live at an upcoming >> teleconference. >> >> This one may be addressed already by FPR3, but I am sending it just >> in case. >> >> -- dan >> >> [1] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/0024.html >> [2] >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2010Oct/att-0001/speech.html#r10 >> >> > > > > -- > Bjorn Bringert > Google UK Limited, Registered Office: Belgrave House, 76 Buckingham > Palace Road, London, SW1W 9TQ > Registered in England Number: 3977902
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 13:39:28 UTC