- From: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@traversetechnologies.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:15:43 -0400
- To: GeoXG GeoXG <member-xg-geo@w3.org>, GeoXG GeoXG <public-xg-geo@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 14:17:21 UTC
Hi, For today's call, Review and comments on neogeo vocabulary. Is it complete? Is it correct? What shall we do with it? Is there material from the GeoQualifier proposal which should be incorporated? Next steps - discussion of further work items Question: is it valuable to proceed with the basic ontologies outlined in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/geo/Wiki/ Spatial_Ontologies which might then become the concern of an Interest Group "or" would it be more valuable to get started on a geospatial "dialect" like GeoSWRL (thanks to Dave Kolas and Mike Dean) which could become a W3C Recommendation and concern of a Working Group? See you then. Josh Lieberman Geospatial XG Coordinator Principal, Traverse Technologies Inc. mailto:jlieberman@traversetechnologies.com tel +1 (617) 395-7766 fax: +1 (815) 717-981
Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 14:17:21 UTC