- From: Joshua Lieberman <jlieberman@traversetechnologies.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 12:31:29 -0400
- To: GeoXG GeoXG <public-xg-geo@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <96EB913B-1787-4E39-B08D-12BFD617D1EA@traversetechnologies.com>
Hi, I will not be able to join a telecon today, but will plan one for next Monday and hope that some people can join me on the IRC channel from time to time between now and then. Just returned from the European Geoinformatics Workshop put on by the E-Science Center in Edinburgh, which was an interesting conjunction of geo as in geosciences, geo as in geography, and geo as in geosemantics. I will post further thoughts and information on the Geospatial XG web pages, but here are some initial observations: The workshop participants made clear that there are complexities and subtleties in how we observe and model the Earth which are still fairly far beyond the state of formal semantics work. There are, however, opportunities to expand the way such work is done, particularly involving the Web, which have simpler if not more subtle requirements. Well defined paths from Web representations to more private ones which do not violate the more sophisticated representations are critical to this. Other angles which the workshop looked at were the social aspects of scientific networking, and the large-scale aspects of scientific networks, e.g. grids. There is clearly a need to add not only geosemantics and content semantics into semantic Web service work, but also management, topology, transactional protocol, security and rights. Almost any progress there would be significant, e.g. the spatial ontology areas already jotted down for the Geo XG. More on this later. In the meantime, we are desperately in need of review, comment, and refinement for the neogeo vocabulary. Please help out. Cheers, Josh Lieberman Geospatial XG Coordinator mailto:jlieberman@traversetechnologies.com tel +1 (617) 395-7766 fax: +1 (815) 717-981
Received on Monday, 12 March 2007 16:31:43 UTC