- From: Allan Doyle <adoyle@eogeo.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:54:14 -0400
- To: "Andrew Turner" <georss@highearthorbit.com>
- Cc: "Holger Knublauch" <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-xg-geo@w3.org, georss@lists.eogeo.org
I think radius is in dispute... I forget who likes it and who does not. The issue, as far as I recall, is that GML does not have a circle that's defined by a point and a radius so GeoRSS Simple can't have one. Allan On Jul 21, 2006, at 16:43, Andrew Turner wrote: > Holger Knublauch wrote: >> >> Thanks Joshua. With a basic glimpse on this, I would hope that >> the geo >> ontology is extended with a geo:radius attribute: it is a low hanging >> fruit while having feature types is probably an overkill. To specify > > There is a radius in GeoRSS Simple: > > <georss:point radius="500">45.256 -110.45</georss:point> > > It was at the bottom of the "Simple" page, so maybe you missed it. :) > Andrew > > -- > Andrew Turner > ajturner@highearthorbit.com 42.4266N x 83.4931W > http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA > _______________________________________________ > georss mailing list > georss@lists.eogeo.org > http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss -- Allan Doyle +1.781.433.2695 adoyle@eogeo.org
Received on Saturday, 22 July 2006 15:24:30 UTC