- From: Daniel Harris <daniel@kendra.org.uk>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 08:54:22 +0100
- To: public-xg-federatedsocialweb <public-xg-federatedsocialweb@w3.org>
On 14 May 2011, at 20:17, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 14 May 2011 10:24, Markus Sabadello <markus.sabadello@gmail.com> wrote: >> "A community will evolve only when a people control their own communication" >> -- Frantz Fanon > > Nice. > > That hints at one of the reasons I find 'federated social Web' an > awkward framing of the problems we're addressing. > > The use of political language is interesting, but it suggests that the > 'federation' we're concerned with is one about relations between big > social sites (canonically Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, > Friendster-as-was and so on). The real action ought to focus on the > groups and individuals who use all these sites, not the 'federation' > of sites they're using. If Twitter and Facebook make a partnership, > that's great and all but I don't want the future of group > communication to be beholden to the whims of product managers and > CEOs... I agree that the "real action ought to focus on the groups and individuals who use all these sites". It's a question of scale though. I see the the 'federation' happening between social sites; between smaller agents acting on behalf of groups and individuals; and the groups and individuals themselves. One big spaghetti of relationships, trust, permissions, etc. I guess it's up to all of us to keep the 'user' at the forefront of our minds - and that is not in question from the sentiment heard so far on this list. Great stuff. Cheers Daniel
Received on Sunday, 15 May 2011 07:54:50 UTC