- From: Catherine Pelachaud <pelachaud@iut.univ-paris8.fr>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:59:58 +0200
- To: EMOXG-public <public-xg-emotion@w3.org>
Dear all, I am not able to attend the meeting tomorrow. Here is my 2 cents comment. Best, Catherine Core 1: I would prefer to use a generic word 'affect' with different types (emotion, mood, feeling, ...). Core 3: Isn't it possible to retrieve from the dimension set specification if it is unipolar or bipolar? Core 5: Couldn't we use one default set of action tendencies and use mapping table to adapt the action tendencies to other entities (eg robot, virtual agent, ...)? Core 6: Somehow I find difficult to define the added value of having a tag 'complex emotion' without having a tag 'regulation'. That is we consider only one type of complex emotion, namely the superposition of several emotions. If it is so, we can express superposition of several emotions through the time information of each emotion. Link2: Isn't it redundant to have start, end and duration attributes? wouldn't 2 attributes be enough (one can retrieve the 3rd attributes from the 2): eg start and end, or start and duration. I think it is important to have the possibility to specify onset, apex, offset values; maybe 2 time attributes for each value would be enough. Best, Catherine Marc Schroeder a écrit : > Dear all, > > please find attached an attempt to summarise the spec drafting > discussions so far. You can see that we agree in quite some core > points, but that peripheral issues are very much vague still. > > Let us take this as a basis for the discussions in the remainder of > this Incubator group. > > Concretely, for the phone meeting on 2 October, I suggest: > > * discuss Modality (Meta 2) > * discuss elements where Confidence (Meta 1) can be used; > * identify issues to discuss at the f2f in Cannes. > > Regards, > Marc > > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 October 2008 14:00:29 UTC