- From: Myriam Lamolle <m.lamolle@iut.univ-paris8.fr>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:14:19 +0100
- To: "Ian Wilson" <ian@neon.ai>
- Cc: public-xg-emotion@w3.org
- Message-ID: <eaf15ade0801210414w392e7643h4f86b5ebc5ff1c3b@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, you can see an example of emoxg deep structure representation online : http://www.iut.univ-paris8.fr/~lamolle/EMOXG/example_deep_emoxg.xml <http://www.iut.univ-paris8.fr/%7Elamolle/EMOXG/example_deep_emoxg.xml> I take into account use case requirements... I integrated also some global metadata (such as social environment) in the definition of emoxg but they don't appears in the example... For Ian, you wrote : "RDF is primarily aimed at semantic web applications where the data is to be read by another application, rather than a person. It contains a lot of data so is heavier than XML. However, one useful point for what we are doing is that terms can be defined and referenced, as opposed to XML where the terms are your own construction and are not defined, so if you had an XML attribute called "label" you do not know if that means a "tag", a package label or a record label. With RDF there is a URI to where each term is defined so this ambiguity is resolved. Our effort has making terms unambiguous as a goal I think?" I think it's possible to add semantic in the type definition in XML Schema Definition using <span class="tag"> for example to specify "label" is a tag... but it's not easier than RDF... Myriam 2008/1/17, Ian Wilson <ian@neon.ai>: > > > I see the inline example is difficult to read with the small format of > this mailing list view, so here is a link to the file online: > > http://www.neon.ai/docs/emoxgRDFexample.rdf > > You should be able to see this nicely in your browser or right click and > save it. > > Ian > > > -- IUT de Montreuil - Département Informatique 140, rue de la Nouvelle France 93100 Montreuil tél: +33 (0)1 48 70 34 61
Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 12:14:34 UTC