- From: Marc Schroeder <schroed@dfki.de>
- Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 09:47:43 +0100
- To: EMOXG-public <public-xg-emotion@w3.org>
Dear all,
Our next phone meeting will be held:
*Monday 12 February 2007, at 13:00 UTC*
For access details, see previous member-only mails or the following w3c
member-only page:
http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar.html#s_2476
AGENDA
======
For the phone meeting on 12 February 2007.
1. Review the minutes of previous meeting.
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion/minutes-2007-01-15.html
In particular, we had a relatively long list of action items, and not
all of it has happened.
2. Continued discussion on requirements document.
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/emotion/wiki/UseCasesRequirements
As you know, we have gone through that document up to the end of section
2 in the last phone meeting, so we will continue with point 3 "Links to
signals and signs" and will try to finish this first walk through the
document.
As last time, results of this initial discussion should be twofold:
notes on agreement, as in "requirement 1.1 is agreed", and in action
items, where individuals commit to attempting to clarify an unclear
issue. The resulting action items should be many, of the type "person X
to clarify meaning of point Y".
The main goal should be to prepare part of the discussion to be held at
the face-to-face meeting in Munich, by making it as explicit as possible
which issues are clear/agreed and which are unclear/need discussion.
3. Preparation for discussing specification possibilities
One thing that we should do in Munich is start discussing
specifications. In preparation for that, we should collect existing
specifications that we can start from. Of course there is the HUMAINE
EARL, there is the HUMAINE database annotation scheme, and maybe others.
Let us list them! Ideally, for each of them, we would find a volunteer
who looks through the existing specification and shows how it fits /
doesn't fit the various use case requirements.
Also, there are some basic design principles among which a standard
format will have to choose. Human-readable XML ("simple is beautiful");
hierarchical XML ("structure is needed to make it precise"); RDF
("Ontologies are the solution"), etc. It would be nice to have
proponents for the different design principles, and have them engage in
a friendly discussion! I will ask for volunteers for this as well.
4. Date of next meeting
If we get through this agenda reasonably (getting reliable commitments
to drive the discussion forward off-line), we should not need an
additional phone meeting before the f2f (26-27 March, Munich).
Best wishes,
Marc
--
Dr. Marc Schröder, Senior Researcher
DFKI GmbH, Stuhlsatzenhausweg 3, D-66123 Saarbrücken, Germany
http://www.dfki.de/~schroed
Here. Now. Real, first-person experience. Am I there to witness it?
--
official DFKI coordinates:
Deutsches Forschungszentrum fuer Kuenstliche Intelligenz GmbH
Trippstadter Strasse 122, D-67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany
Geschaeftsfuehrung:
Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Wolfgang Wahlster (Vorsitzender)
Dr. Walter Olthoff
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Prof. Dr. h.c. Hans A. Aukes
Amtsgericht Kaiserslautern, HRB 2313
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 08:48:22 UTC