RE: [EMOXG] Use Case 3 Requirements Analysis

Dear Ian and all,

Your document is an excellent starting point for the UC3 requirements
discussion, and at this stage we agree to organize things at a very
general level. Anyway here are some comments that we hope will be
useful.

 
> 1. Which items do you think should be cut from the set (if any)?

Regarding the input events, maybe the reward and penalty items could be
merged into one item whose values could span from negative to positive
values.

> 2. Which items do you think should be added to the set (if any)?

None.


> 3. For requirements that you specified in the original set:
>    a. Have I interpreted them correctly?

We think so.

>    b. Should they be listed differently?

Just few annotations. Regarding the output events, and particularly the
third one, it would be better to indicate in a general way "Speech to
produce" or "Audio to produce" in stead of "Speech act to produce".
Actually we should consider both speech (including speech acts) and
non-speech events like laughs, pains, hesitations, etc.
Moreover in the sub-item "vocal parameter to update" the example "muscle
contractions" could be replaced by "pitch raise" or "speech rate
increase" or something like that.
 
Best Regards,

Enrico e Paolo


Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di Telecom Italia S.p.A.

================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please send an e_mail to <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
================================================

Received on Thursday, 23 November 2006 13:30:50 UTC