- From: Kostas Karpouzis <kkarpou@cs.ntua.gr>
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 14:38:22 +0200
- To: Ian Wilson <ian@emotion.ai>
- CC: public-xg-emotion@w3.org
Hi Ian, everybody, I was wondering if it lies within the scope of UC3 to deal with how to go from the 'output events' label to actual low-level (FAP, AU, etc.) values. If it's not, then I suppose that this is a link to an external file/data source/URI, right? Kostas Ian Wilson wrote: > I have compiled an analysis of requirements from the suggestions or use case 3. > This use case has requirements that are very similar to those described in the > EARL specification. > > For all those members who have registered interest in use case 3 discussions > (Jianhua and myself, Marc, Enrico, Jean-Claude, Paolo, Alejandra, Hannes, > Catherine and Kostas) please look over the list for the following points: > > 1. Which items do you think should be cut from the set (if any)? > 2. Which items do you think should be added to the set (if any)? > 3. For requirements that you specified in the original set: > a. Have I interpreted them correctly? > b. Should they be listed differently? > > These questions should be enough for us to start I think. If you have any other > ideas let me know, thanks. > > Best, > > Ian > Emotion AI > www.emotion.ai > blog.emotion.ai >
Received on Thursday, 23 November 2006 12:38:53 UTC