- From: Carl Reed <creed@opengeospatial.org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 09:00:29 -0700
- To: "Don Cameron" <donc@internode.on.net>, "'Gavin Treadgold'" <gt@kestrel.co.nz>, "'public-xg-eiif'" <public-xg-eiif@w3.org>
Don - A short (4 page) summary can be downloaded from http://dels.nas.edu/dels/rpt_briefs/successful_response_final.pdf and the entire report can be viewed for free (but not downloadable for free) http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=quS0xwXDTNEC&dq=successful+response+starts+with+a+map&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=3q5tXHH48_&sig=XPqZ-a4WgTXaea2bojtZ7v9WFus#PPA11,M1 or for sale from http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11793 Regards Carl ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Cameron" <donc@internode.on.net> To: "'Carl Reed'" <creed@opengeospatial.org>; "'Gavin Treadgold'" <gt@kestrel.co.nz>; "'public-xg-eiif'" <public-xg-eiif@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 2:15 AM Subject: RE: EM Standards List >> One of the 12 major recommendations from the US Academy Report >> "Successful Response Starts with a Map" was to break down the >> communication barriers between the EM, GIS, and IT communities >> and to enhance EM training of GIS professionals that work in >> EOCs and so forth > > Hi Carl, > > Is the US Academy Report available online? - it seems to include excellent > recommendations. Attached for interest (and in support of Carls comments) > is > a small composite of a satellite image, CAD output and manually drawn > exclusion zone for an evacuation I am coordinating tomorrow. This > particular > evac is small and happening in a relatively unpopulated area (only a few > sq > kilometres), but still demonstrative of maping systems being used from the > outset of disaster pre-planning and prevention right through to response, > mitigation, impact recovery and rebuilding. In this case the mapping > function is used in support of our other deployed EM tools (seismic > monitoring, evacuation alarms, personnel tracking systems, PPE, comms and > protocols, ICS procedures and structures etc. etc.). > > I guess it's also demonstrative of how EM is no longer limited to govt > emergency response agencies. If the last decade was the decade of building > business continuity through IT systems and backups; this decade is surely > that of building business continuity through implementation of > best-practice > emergency planning and management (mostly courtesy of the events > surrounding > 911 and the tsunami, although in truth strongly reminiscent of the '70's > cold war that saw IBM in Sydney construct an atomic bomb-proof shelter for > it's mainframes, so IBM Au could take over from IBM US when the US was > inevitably bombed by Russia!). Response agency-trained EM personnel > nowadays > need only look in the positions vacant columns of local newspapers to find > an array of corporate positions on offer, something unheard of a few years > ago. This fortunately has brought a whole new sphere of financing, support > and professionalism to the EM sector. In my view, welcome additions > although > the impact on this project should not be understated. Corporate interests > (national and global) also have a strong vested interest in Emergency > Management systems and compatibilities. > > Kind regards, > Don Cameron >
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 2008 16:21:13 UTC