- From: Tom Worthington <Tom.Worthington@tomw.net.au>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:11:35 +1100
- To: donc@internode.on.net,public-xg-eiif@w3.org, public-xg-eiif-request@w3.org
- Cc: humanitarian-ict@yahoogroups.com
At 12:09 PM 22/02/2008, donc@internode.on.net wrote: >... We may need to consider what we mean by 'standard' when >referencing works and developments. ... I suggest including commonly used practice which is not part of a formal standard. One example of a defacto standard is how the Tsunami warning centers format their messages, an area which is in need of formal standards: <http://www.tomw.net.au/blog/2007/07/tsunami-warning-system-communication.html>. There are also formal documents which are really standards, but not labelled that, such as W3C "recommendations" <http://www.w3.org/TR/#Recommendations>. Clearly these should be included. There are of course some e-documents labelled "standard" and issued by official bodies, which are not worth the paper they aren't written on. ;-) The Wikipedia entry for Standard seems to cover it well. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_%28technical%29>: --- "A technical standard is an established norm or requirement. It is usually a formal document that establishes uniform engineering or technical criteria, methods, processes and practices. A technical standard can also be a controlled artifact or similar formal means used for calibration. Reference Standards and certified reference materials have an assigned value by direct comparison with a reference base. A primary standard is usually under jurisdication of a national standards body. Secondary, tertiary, check standards and standard materials may be used for reference in a metrology system. This article discusses formal technical standards. A custom, convention, company product, corporate standard, etc which becomes generally accepted and dominant is often called a de facto standard. A technical standard can be developed privately or unilaterally, for example by a corporation, regulatory body, military, etc. Standards can also be developed by groups such as trade unions, and trade associations. Standards organizations usually have more diverse input and usually develop voluntary standards: these might become mandatory if adopted by a government, business contract, etc. The standardization process may be by edict or may involve the formal consensus [1] of technical experts." --- Tom Worthington FACS HLM tom.worthington@tomw.net.au Ph: 0419 496150 Director, Tomw Communications Pty Ltd ABN: 17 088 714 309 PO Box 13, Belconnen ACT 2617 http://www.tomw.net.au/ Adjunct Senior Lecturer, ANU
Received on Sunday, 24 February 2008 23:38:24 UTC