- From: Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 19:30:43 +0200
- To: David Humphrey <David.Humphrey@senecac.on.ca>
- Cc: public-xg-audio@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 17:31:15 UTC
Great to hear that, Dave! Is there any schedule / a version to expect this feature to land on? Jussi On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:16 PM, David Humphrey <David.Humphrey@senecac.on.ca > wrote: > As for the web workers, it would be pretty cool if Moz got it working. I >> did >> an experiment few months ago, which does the processing in a worker, then >> passes it to back to the script, but it couldn't handle realtime without >> pops and clips (and thus the whole thing was pretty unsafe as I did some >> bad >> coding, and when those were combined I'd get a buffer underflow, and a >> serious memory leak). >> > > What we're exploring now is a way for a worker to talk directly to the > audio back-end. There won't be latency issues, because you will feed the > audio buffers from underneath, as it were, bypassing the main thread > altogether. The current issues you have are the result of workers needing > to write the audio from the main thread. Our initial tests with this have > been very good, but we're figuring out a proper interface and some impl > details. > > Dave >
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 17:31:15 UTC