Re: [Backplane XG] Updated draft of XG final report

Gregory -- you wrote:

>>charlie, do you want me to make edits to the copy of the XGR draft
>>steven just circulated, then zip it up with all of the longdesc
>>files currently housed at:

>>http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/temp/w3c/rwab

>>and send it to the list?

That would be most helpful!  Thanks, Charlie

Charles Wiecha
Multichannel Web Interaction
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
P.O. Box 704
Yorktown Heights, N.Y.  10598
Phone: (914) 784-6180, T/L 863-6180, Cell: (914) 232-3483
wiecha@us.ibm.com



                                                                                                                                
  From:       "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>                                                                         
                                                                                                                                
  To:         "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, Charles F Wiecha/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, public-xg-app-backplane          
              <public-xg-app-backplane@w3.org>                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
  Date:       10/13/2009 06:38 PM                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
  Subject:    Re: [Backplane XG] Updated draft of XG final report                                                               
                                                                                                                                





aloha, steven!

thank you VERY much for your quick work...  as to eumeration, there are
a total of 9 "figures " in the latest draft circulated by charlie, but
the text refers to them as:

* Figure 1: Layers of the RWAB
* Figure 2: Tracking Expenses
* Figure 3: Expenses by category in SVG
* Figure 4: Expenses by time in SVG
* Figure 5: Expenses summarized and reported in Open Document Text format
* Figure 8: Single node data binding in ODF
* Figure 9: Data-bound custom controls using YUI widgets
* Figure 10: Nodeset data-bound custom controls using SVG
* Figure 11: A SMIL slideshow embedded in a webpage

re-ordered, this means:

* figure 8 should be figure 6
* figure 9 should be figure 7
* figure 10 should be figure 8
* figure 11 should be figure 9

all of the longdesc files are complete, save for that for figure 6
"Single node data binding in ODF"

charlie, do you want me to make edits to the copy of the XGR draft
steven just circulated, then zip it up with all of the longdesc
files currently housed at:

http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/temp/w3c/rwab

and send it to the list?

gregory.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Sometimes I think my writing sounds like I walked out of the room
and left the typewriter running.                   -- Gene Fowler
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita: oedipus@hicom.net OR gregory@ubats.org
     Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/
            Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

---------- Original Message -----------
From: "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
To: "Charles F Wiecha" <wiecha@us.ibm.com>, public-xg-app-backplane
<public-xg-app-backplane@w3.org>
Sent: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:11:03 +0200
Subject: Re: [Backplane XG] Updated draft of XG final report

> Here is the zip.
>
> I have added Jack's new bit, and a table of contents.
>
> I have done my best to integrate the longdescs: I have added the
> return  IDs, and the [D] notation (just to make it easier to
> check the longdescs);  as a result of the return IDs the main
> file must be called Overview.html,  and be in the same directory
> as the longdescs. However, the numbering of  the figures (and
> the number of them?) seems to have changed, and I haven't  had
> time to work out what needs to be done to fix that. Sorry.
>
> Steven
------- End of Original Message -------