- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 22:11:03 +0000
- To: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1708121417665.968344979.3046392420@cwi.nl>
I made the changes to the three sections. Let me know if you are happy.
Steven
On Friday 16 February 2024 04:38:21 (+01:00), Erik Bruchez wrote:
A few comments:
- I never liked calling a "form built with XForms" "an XForm" [1], and this is the only occurrence of this use in the spec (well, 3 times, but related to this feature). I would just say "a form", "the form", etc. In fact, you already use "the embedded form" once later.
- "as described in that section": I suppose that means the `<shared>` element section. In that case I would make it clearer ("as described in the shared element section") and link to the section. [2]
- `xforms-binding-error` is not linked, but other events are.
- "In the absence of errors" should be clarified: should it mean that none of the error events were canceled (which would lead to a "halts processing" condition), or should it mean that no error events were dispatched? I assume the latter. I would reword this to say "if no error events were dispatched" or something like that.
-Erik
[1] Also used as a noun in the 2002 article "What Are XForms".
[2] #The_shared_Element
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 4:39 AM Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl <mailto:steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> > wrote:
There's nothing new yet to talk about today, so I propose no call.
However, it would be great if you used the time to quickly check
https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_Control_Element
https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_shared_Element
https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_signal_Element
and let me know if anything is unclear, or otherwise signal that you're
happy with the text.
Thanks!
Steven
Received on Friday, 16 February 2024 22:11:10 UTC