W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xformsusers@w3.org > February 2019

Re: ACTION-2224: Summarise the use of "empty sequence"

From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:46:40 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAc0PEVj52k9m136MXppLs6sT3W9JeAaktWqy1fe-n2m3LEfpA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
Cc: XForms <public-xformsusers@w3.org>, XForms Users Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
LGTM.

On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:17 AM Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
wrote:

> So what happened is that "Nodeset" and "Empty nodeset" from XForms 1.1
> got
> replaced throughout by "Sequence" and "Empty Sequence".
>
> The advantage of a calculate returning an empty sequence on evaluation
> error is that controls bound to it will be disabled, so the suggestion of
> using an empty string instead is a bad one.
>
> So I think Empty sequence should remain. I have however added Sequence
> and
> Empty sequence to the glossary.
>
>      https://www.w3.org/community/xformsusers/wiki/XForms_2.0#def-sequence
>
> Steven
>
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 15:37:35 +0100, XForms Users Community Group Issue
> Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>
> > ACTION-2224: Summarise the use of "empty sequence"
> >
> > https://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/xforms/actions/2224
> >
> > Assigned to: Steven Pemberton
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2019 19:47:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 19 February 2019 19:47:15 UTC