Re: Linked Data Shapes, Forms and Footprints

Dear public xformsuser and Steven,

There was one word missed in the message of mine (On 12/7/2019 9:53 AM)

Considering its date of writing (2019/04/26) and last change (2019/07/12):
if I have not been missing since then, the document has not been this list
since then...

Berner-Lee, T, "Linked Data Shapes, Forms, and Footprints"

It discuss technologies to help with building apps on top of data: shapes,
forms, and footprints...


https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Footprints.html



Considering its date of writing (2019/04/26) and last change (2019/07/12):
if I have not been missing since then, the document has not been this list
since then...


This paragraph should be:

Considering its date of writing (2019/04/26) and last change (2019/07/12):
if I have not been missing since then, the document has not been in this
list since then...





Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Minggu, 08 Desember 2019, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
menulis:

> Dear Owen & public-xformsusers,
>
> For the Internet and the Web, thus networks of computer-based
> communications and informations --at least considering the Web goals of
> interoperbility and evolvability/evolution if they are still so while if it
> has not been changed evolution is a main concern of Internet engineers--,
> there would supposedly be networks of applications supported by languages:
> and there would also be those of intentions/interests of users' and
> architects'... Is'nt it so...?
>
>
>
>
> Regard,
> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>
> Pada Sabtu, 07 Desember 2019, Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> menulis:
>
>> This is a bit beyond my level of technical expertise but here are a
>> couple passages on which I do have a point of view:
>>
>> "... how do we build systems in which users and apps are easily allowed
>> to express useful, helpful things? "
>>
>> To me, "useful, helpful" means enabling us to more easily and effectively
>> accomplish our objectives.  The first step is to think clearly about what
>> we want to accomplish and the second is to document our long-term goals and
>> near-term objectives -- preferably in an open, standard, machine-readable
>> format (especially if we need to engage others in order to achieve them).
>> At that point, AI and value-added services can be applied to identify the
>> necessary inputs and processing capabilities, thereby revolutionizing the
>> ridiculously inefficient advertising and marketing paradigm.
>>
>> Joe Carmel initially developed these XForms to enable the documentation
>> of goals, objectives, and stakeholders in StratML format:
>> http://stratml.us/forms/Part1Form.xml & http://stratml.us/forms/Part2F
>> orm.xml  Jorge Sanchez is working on a wizard version at
>> http://stratml.us/vionta/forms/wizard/0_mainform.xml
>>
>> "The problem of where to store new data"
>>
>> Why not open, machine-readable documents
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine-readable_document>, in which both
>> the semantics as well as the structure have been well specified?
>>
>> At scale (e.g., beyond Dunbar's Number
>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar%27s_number>), accountability
>> requires good, complete, and reliable records.  Triples, graphs, and
>> microcode simply will not suffice for business-quality information.  See
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_corners_(law)
>>
>> Ower
>> On 12/7/2019 9:53 AM, Guntur Wiseno Putra wrote:
>>
>> Dear Steven & public-xformsusers,
>>
>> Considering its date of writing (2019/04/26) and last change
>> (2019/07/12): if I have not been missing since then, the document has not
>> been this list since then...
>>
>> Berner-Lee, T, "Linked Data Shapes, Forms, and Footprints"
>>
>> It discuss technologies to help with building apps on top of data:
>> shapes, forms, and footprints...
>>
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Footprints.html
>>
>> Regard,
>> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>>
>>